Please leave your comments below or within the appropriate post on my Facebook page. Please feel free to peruse other people’s comments and respond to them.
***Please be aware this is a book club discussion, so there is the possibility that my review or the comments left by others will contain spoilers***
Sweet Pea
by CJ Skuse
Synopsis
Incredibly bored and ambitious Rhiannon likes to make daily lists. Don’t we all, except her list are “kill lists”. She writes a list every day of everyone she would personally like to kill and at times she is able to tick off that list. A childhood trauma, left Rhiannon a minor celebrity and it is through this tragedy that we learn how Rhiannon has become the person she is today; a foul-mouthed, deadly and dark young woman.
My Review
What a lovely way to start our book reading year. I thought I’d throw us into the deep end with this shocking and graphic thriller. As the first chapter opens with the protagonist castrating a man and leaving him to drown, I knew I was on to a beautiful, enchanting start to our reading year.
So firstly, I found this book very easy to read. Yep, even with the shocking content of the book, I still carried on turning the pages and reading with ease (does this say more about me or the author?). It was the epitome of a “page-turner” though.
Red magazine described the book as Bridget Jones meets American Psycho. I think this is a perfect description of the book. While I don’t think I need to elaborate on why it’s similar to American Psycho, the diary-style chapters and the humorous references to weight and self-image certainly gave it an air of Bridget.
However, this is where the book falls down for me. With the author’s use of language, I felt she was trying too hard to be funny and shocking. Let’s be honest, I’m not one to be phased by profanity or crudeness. I wasn’t shocked by her use of these things. It just didn’t entertain me. I was a tad arms-crossed-you-think-that’s-shocking-you-should-hear-me-out-with-the-Mums-from-school-on-a-Friday-night about it. You can relax, we don’t go around castrating men or anything (not that I recall anyway). I think the point I’m trying to make is that, it reminded me of a teenager trying to act tough to impress people. I didn’t buy it.
I can’t decide if it was lack of direction or actually a clever ploy by the author, that my opinion of the protagonist was slightly conflicted. Generally, I couldn’t stand her and at times I thought the author wanted us to actually like her in a twisted way. My conflicted feeling about Rhiannon only came into play when I thought about her traumatic past that goes some way to explain why she does the things she does. It enabled me to feel a sliver of sympathy for her, but not for long as not one of the murders she committed was actually justified. In fact, I think her past actually just provided an understanding of her actions rather than feeling actual sympathy. I do feel the author partly wanted us readers to cheer Rhiannon on from the side line as she castrated a man (albeit an absolute wank stain of a man, who deserved a sharp kick in the balls and to be reported to the police), but there is absolutely no way I found myself warming to Rhiannon at any point.
What I do know is that she clearly wasn’t a well person. Now, I understand that a psychopath (and I’m not using that word flippantly), can function quite normally in the world, with many people not having a clue what they’re really like, BUT I’m still not convinced by the way the author portrayed the contradictions within her personality. The whole “just baked a lovey cake, now I’m just going to grab my knife and slice someone up that gets on me nerves” act was unconvincing. Maybe it’s truthful (I’m bold enough to assume I’m personally not a psychopath, so what do I know about how a psychopath thinks). I just wasn’t convinced with the way the author sold Rhiannon’s personality to us.
ALSO, I’m clearly not convinced by a lot of aspects of this book (man, I really am a cynical misery sometimes), but I wasn’t persuaded by the relationship between Rhiannon and Craig. They were so utterly incompatible, I just didn’t see why they got together in the first place. I understand, that the author wanted to show Rhiannon in an unhappy relationship, but I literally couldn’t fathom what they would have seen in each other at the beginning of the relationship. I think she could’ve been a bit cleverer about this relationship.
Now, you can completely judge me on the next point I’m going to make (if you haven’t already), but thank God she killed AJ off. He was such an irritating character, she did us all a favour there.
The ending was very satisfying for me. I would have been very upset if justice hadn’t prevailed. I also figured that the baby may have gone to AJ’s Aunt (as the next closest relative) to look after, which is actually quite nice after all the grimness of the book.
In conclusion, this is a cynical and bleak book. The attempts to make it witty and the protagonist likeable failed for me. However, I couldn’t stop reading it and it kept me gripped until the end. I prefer a book with more substance, but it was entertaining nonetheless.
February’s book is Hold Back the Stars by Kate Khan. I’ll be starting the conversation for this on Monday 5th March.
A list of all the books we’ll be reading for the first half of 2018 can be found here
I’ve finally sorted out my Goodreads page, so as a few people have asked, you can view it here
Hey Hayley, Sounds like it’s worth a flick.Not sure I’ll love it though. Have you read Maestra – sounds quite similar and I LOVED it. Jill
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh no I haven’t, maybe I should check it out!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s second of a trilogy – first one was Domina. Really good romp around Europe (think they are being made in to a movie)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent. Thanks for the suggestion Jill.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You gave a great review. Not sure this would be my kind of read,
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it might be one of those love it or hate it kind of books, though I was kind of in the middle, having said that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey, I’ve nominated you for an award. Check out my latest post 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you SO much. I am truly honoured & flattered. I really appreciate it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Spoiler alert
Well, I read it. It was a struggle at times – the old school friend in the wardrobe? Really? A first person narration tends to make you feel more sympathy for the narrator, but each time I found myself warming a little, or understanding her, she just upped and did something vile. Very satisfying ending, though, and by then the wheels had well and truly come off, and she was quite obviously very very disturbed and disturbing. I struggled to believe that AJ could be quite so stupid and naive, though. A woman tells you she killed someone, and then gets you to pretend to be dead while she has sex with you, and no alarm bells ring?
LikeLike
Ha I know. He wasn’t the brightest. I completely agree with what you say. I’m struggling to understand why so many people loved this book. Sure, it kept me entertained, but so much of it was unbelievable and you’re so right, usually you warm to the character in the first person narration. But not in the case of this book.
LikeLike
I couldn’t say I loved it. A couple of times I nearly put it down, but it was a bit like picking a scab – unpleasant, but compulsive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha yes I know exactly what you mean.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s definitely not my type of book, but I enjoyed the review. To be honest, I probably wouldn’t enjoy Bridget Jones either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks April. No, I’m not a fan of Bridget. Possibly why I wasn’t completely enamoured with this book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
On this occasion the book doesn’t sound good for my February mood!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha possibly not.
LikeLike
Wow, sounds quite full on! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a bit!
LikeLiked by 1 person